Metal wood club

ABSTRACT

A golf club head is provided having a body and a face insert, with a slot in a perimeter region of the body of the club head adjacent the face insert. The slot increases the flex of the hitting surface on impact with a golf ball, thereby increasing the speed with which the ball rebounds off the hitting face and increases the overall distance the ball is hit. The slot preferably moves the sweet spot of the hitting face a distance X from the face center of the hitting face. The slot may be filled with an elastomeric material.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to an improved golf club head. Moreparticularly, the present invention relates to a golf club head having athrough-slot provided in a perimeter region of a body of the club headadjacent the face insert to improve the flex of the face of the clubhead.

BACKGROUND

The complexities of golf club design are well known. The specificationsfor each component of the club (i.e., the club head, shaft, grip, andsubcomponents thereof) directly impact the performance of the club.Thus, by varying the design specifications, a golf club can be tailoredto have specific performance characteristics.

The design of club heads has long been studied. Among the more prominentconsiderations in club head design are loft, lie, face angle, horizontalface bulge, vertical face roll, center of gravity, inertia, materialselection, and overall head weight. While this basic set of criteria isgenerally the focus of golf club engineering, several other designaspects must also be addressed. The interior design of the club head maybe tailored to achieve particular characteristics, such as the inclusionof hosel or shaft attachment means, perimeter weights on the club head,and fillers within hollow club heads.

Golf club heads must also be strong to withstand the repeated impactsthat occur during collisions between the golf club and the golf ball.The loading that occurs during this transient event can create a peakforce of over 2,000 lbs. Thus, a major challenge is designing the clubface and body to resist permanent deformation or failure by materialyield or fracture. Conventional hollow metal wood drivers made fromtitanium typically have a uniform face thickness exceeding 2.5 mm toensure structural integrity of the club head.

Players generally seek a metal wood driver and golf ball combinationthat delivers maximum distance and landing accuracy. The distance a balltravels after impact is dictated by the magnitude and direction of theball's translational velocity and the ball's rotational velocity orspin. Environmental conditions, including atmospheric pressure,humidity, temperature, and wind speed, further influence the ball'sflight. However, these environmental effects are beyond the control ofthe golf equipment manufacturer. Golf ball landing accuracy is driven bya number of factors as well. Some of these factors are attributed toclub head design, such as center of gravity and club face flexibility.

The United States Golf Association (USGA), the governing body for therules of golf in the United States, has specifications for theperformance of golf balls. These performance specifications dictate thesize and weight of a conforming golf ball. One USGA rule limits the golfball's initial velocity after a prescribed impact to 250 feet per second±2% (or 255 feet per second maximum initial velocity). To achievegreater golf ball travel distance, ball velocity after impact and thecoefficient of restitution of the ball-club impact must be maximizedwhile remaining within this rule.

Generally, golf ball travel distance is a function of the total kineticenergy imparted to the ball during impact with the club head, neglectingenvironmental effects. During impact, kinetic energy is transferred fromthe club and stored as elastic strain energy in the club head and asviscoelastic strain energy in the ball. After impact, the stored energyin the ball and in the club is transformed back into kinetic energy inthe form of translational and rotational velocity of the ball, as wellas the club. Since the collision is not perfectly elastic, a portion ofenergy is dissipated in club head vibration and in viscoelasticrelaxation of the ball. Viscoelastic relaxation is a material propertyof the polymeric materials used in all manufactured golf balls.

Viscoelastic relaxation of the ball is a parasitic energy source, whichis dependent upon the rate of deformation. To minimize this effect, therate of deformation must be reduced. This may be accomplished byallowing more club face deformation during impact. Since metallicdeformation may be purely elastic, the strain energy stored in the clubface is returned to the ball after impact thereby increasing the ball'soutbound velocity after impact.

A variety of techniques may be utilized to vary the deformation of theclub face, including uniform face thinning, thinned faces with ribbedstiffeners and varying thickness, among others. These designs shouldhave sufficient structural integrity to withstand repeated impactswithout permanently deforming the club face. In general, conventionalclub heads also exhibit wide variations in initial ball speed afterimpact, depending on the impact location on the face of the club. Hence,there remains a need in the art for a club head that has a larger “sweetzone” or zone of substantially uniform high initial ball speed.

Technological breakthroughs in recent years provide the average golferwith more distance, such as making larger head clubs while keeping theweight constant or even lighter, by casting consistently thinner shellthickness and going to lighter materials such as titanium. Also, thefaces of clubs have been steadily becoming extremely thin. The thinnerface maximizes the coefficient of restitution (COR). The more a facerebounds upon impact, the more energy that may be imparted to the ball,thereby increasing distance. In order to make the faces thinner,manufacturers have moved to a forged or stamped metal face which arestronger than cast faces. Common practice is to attach the forged orstamped metal face by welding them to the body or sole. The thinnerfaces are more vulnerable to failure. The present invention provides anovel manner for providing the face of the club with the desired flexand rebound at impact thereby maximizing COR.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a golf club head adapted for attachmentto a shaft. An embodiment of the present invention is a golf club headthat includes a body having a perimeter region defining an opening and aface insert disposed in the opening. The face insert has a geometricface center and an area of maximum coefficient of restitution. At leastone slot is disposed in the perimeter region of the body, wherein thearea of maximum coefficient of restitution is disposed between thegeometric face center and the slot. The club head may be for a fairwaywood, a driver or iron.

The slot may be an elongated slot substantially parallel to a portion ofan edge of the body. The slot may have a width of greater than 1 mm anda length of greater than 15 mm. The slot may comprise two opposing ends,the ends having expanded slot portions. The slot may provide a space inthe body, such that the face insert flexes when the face insert impactsa golf ball. The slot may be substantially filled with at least oneelastomeric material.

The face insert defines a face plane and the slot may be disposed lessthan 30 mm from the face plane. The area of maximum coefficient ofrestitution may be provided less than 20 mm from the geometric facecenter. In one embodiment, the coefficient of restitution may beprovided less than about 10 mm from the geometric face center. Inanother embodiment, the area of maximum coefficient of restitution isprovided within 2 mm of the geometric face center.

In one embodiment, the face insert defines a plane and at least one ofthe slots is disposed on a sole portion of the perimeter region adjacentthe face plane. In another embodiment, the face insert defines a planeand at least one of the slots is disposed on a crown portion of theperimeter region adjacent the face plane. In another embodiment, theface insert defines a plane and at least one of the slots is disposed ona heel portion of the perimeter region adjacent the face plane. In yetanother embodiment, the face insert defines a plane and at least one ofthe slots is disposed on a toe portion of the perimeter region adjacentthe face plane.

The slot may increase the carry distance of a ball hit with the clubhead as compared with a club head without a slot. The slot may increasethe speed at which a golf ball rebounds from the face insert of the clubhead as compared with a club head without a slot. In one embodiment, thespeed at which a golf ball rebounds from the face insert of the clubhead is increased at least 0.5 mph as compared with a club head withouta slot. The slot may increase the launch angle of a golf ball leavingthe face insert after impact with the club head as compared with a clubhead without a slot. In one embodiment, the launch angle of a golf ballleaving the face insert is increased by at least 0.5 degrees as comparedwith a club head without a slot. The slot may decrease the back spin ofa golf ball leaving the face insert after impact with the club head ascompared with a club head without a slot. In one embodiment, the slotdecreases back spin by at least 100 rpm as compared with a club headwithout a slot.

In another embodiment, a golf club head is provided. The club headincludes a body having a perimeter region defining an opening and a faceinsert disposed in the opening. The face insert has a geometric facecenter and an area of maximum coefficient of restitution. At least oneslot disposed in the perimeter region of the body, wherein the speed atwhich a golf ball rebounds from the face insert of the club head isincreased at least 0.5 mph as compared with a club head without a slot.In one embodiment, the speed at which a golf ball rebounds from the faceis increased at least 1 mph as compared with a conventional club headwithout a slot.

In another embodiment, a golf club head is provided. The club headincludes a body having a perimeter region defining an opening and a faceinsert disposed in the opening. The face insert has a geometric facecenter and an area of maximum coefficient of restitution. At least oneslot is disposed on the perimeter region of the body, wherein the areaof maximum coefficient of restitution is disposed within a zone on theface insert and the maximum coefficient of restitution is closer to thegeometric face center as compared with a club without a slot. In oneembodiment, the coefficient of restitution over the entire face is aleast 80% of the maximum coefficient of restitution within the zone.

In another embodiment, a golf club head is provided. The club headincludes a body having a perimeter region defining an opening and a faceinsert disposed in the opening. The face insert has a geometric facecenter and an area of maximum coefficient of restitution. At least oneslot is disposed on the perimeter region of the body, wherein a launchangle of a golf ball leaving the face insert is increased by at least0.5 degrees as compared with a club head without a slot.

In another embodiment, a golf club head is provided. The club headincludes a body having a perimeter region defining an opening and a faceinsert disposed in the opening. The face insert has a geometric facecenter and an area of maximum coefficient of restitution. At least oneslot is disposed on the perimeter region of the body, wherein back spinis decreased by at least 100 rpm as compared with a club head without aslot.

In yet another embodiment, a golf club head is provided. The club headincludes a body having a crown forming the upper surface of the body, asole forming the lower surface of the body, a club face disposed betweenthe crown and sole, the club face having a face center and an area ofmaximum resilience; and a transition region adjacent the sole and clubface. The transition region defines a slot, wherein the area of maximumresilience is located a distance X from the face center.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Preferred features of the present invention are disclosed in theaccompanying drawings, wherein similar reference characters denotesimilar elements throughout the several views, and wherein:

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an embodiment of a club head of thepresent invention;

FIG. 2 is bottom plan view of an embodiment of a club head of FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of the club head of FIG. 2 taken alongline 3-3 in FIG. 1;

FIGS. 4A-C are detailed cross-sectional views of other embodiments ofthe club head of FIG. 2 taken along line 3-3 of FIG. 1;

FIG. 5 is a bottom perspective view of another alternative embodiment ofa club head of the present invention;

FIG. 6 is a bottom perspective view of another alternative embodiment ofa club head of the present invention;

FIG. 7 is a top perspective view of another alternative embodiment of aclub head of the present invention;

FIG. 8 is a front perspective view of another alternative embodiment ofa club head of the present invention;

FIG. 9 is a graph of estimated carry distance versus vertical impactposition for the inventive club and a conventional club;

FIG. 10 is a graph of impact speed versus vertical impact position andthe club head construction for the inventive club and a conventionalclub;

FIGS. 11-12 are graphs of launch angle versus vertical impact positionand the club head construction for the inventive club and a conventionalclub;

FIGS. 13-14 are graphs of back spin versus vertical impact position andthe club head construction for the inventive club and a conventionalclub; and

FIG. 15 is a graph of estimated carry distance versus heel/tow impactposition and club head construction for the inventive club and aconventional club;

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

COR or coefficient of restitution is a measure of collision efficiency.COR is the ratio of the velocity of separation to the velocity ofapproach. In this model, therefore, COR was determined using thefollowing formula:(v_(club-post)−v_(ball-post))/(v_(ball-pre)−v_(club-pre))where, v_(club-post) represents the velocity of the club after impact;

-   -   v_(ball-post) represents the velocity of the ball after impact;    -   v_(club-pre) represents the velocity of the club before impact        (a value of zero for USGA COR conditions); and    -   v_(ball-pre) represents the velocity of the ball before impact.

COR, in general, depends on the shape and material properties of thecolliding bodies. A perfectly elastic impact has a COR of one (1.0),indicating that no energy is lost, while a perfectly inelastic orperfectly plastic impact has a COR of zero (0.0), indicating that thecolliding bodies did not separate after impact resulting in a maximumloss of energy. Consequently, high COR values are indicative of greaterball velocity and distance.

Referring to FIG. 1, a first embodiment of a golf club head 10 of thepresent invention is shown. Club head 10 includes shell 12 with body 14and a face insert 16. The body 14 includes a toe portion 18, a heelportion 20, a sole portion 22, a hosel 24, a crown portion 26 and askirt portion 28. Optionally, the sole portion 22 may include a plate(not shown) that fits in a recess (not shown) in the bottom of the body14. The body 14 also defines a face perimeter or perimeter region 30adjacent the face insert 16. The body 14 and face insert 16 create aninner cavity 32 (FIG. 3). The face insert 16 has an exterior surface 34and an interior surface 36 (FIG. 3). The exterior surface may haveoptional grooves 38.

A golf club shaft (not shown) is attached at hosel 24 and is disposedalong a shaft axis A-A. The hosel 24 may extend to the bottom of theclub head 10 and may terminate at a location between the sole and crownportions 22 and 26 of the head 10, or the hosel 24 may terminate flushwith the crown portion 26 and extend into the cavity 32 in the head 10.

The inner cavity 32 of club head 10 may be empty, or alternatively maybe filled with foam or other low specific gravity material. It isrecommended that the inner cavity 32 have a volume greater than 250cubic centimeters, and more preferably greater than 275 cubiccentimeters. Preferably, the mass of the inventive club head 10 isgreater than 150 grams, but less than 220 grams; although the club headmay have any suitable weight. The body 14 may be formed of sheets weldedtogether or cast, preferably from a titanium alloy any other suitablematerial.

The perimeter region 30 defines an opening for receiving the face insert16. The face insert 16 is preferably connected to the perimeter region30 of the body 14 by welding. For example, a plurality of chads (notshown) may be in alignment with an inner surface of the body to providea pocket for receiving the face insert 16, which is therein integrallyconnected to the body 14 by welding. The face insert 16 may be made bymilling, casting, forging or stamping and forming. The face insert 16may be made of any suitable material, including titanium, titaniumalloy, carbon steel, stainless steel, beryllium copper, and other metalsor composites.

Alternatively, the body 14 and face insert 16 may be cast simultaneouslyforming a homogeneous shell and eliminating the need to bond orotherwise permanently secure a separate face insert 16 to the body 14.Alternatively, the sole portion 22 or crown portion 26 may be formedseparately and fitted to the remainder of the shell as is known to thoseof skill in the art.

The thickness of the face insert 16 is preferably between about 0.5 mmand about 3 mm, although the face insert 16 may have any suitablethickness. The insert 16 may be of a uniform thickness as shown in FIG.3 or have a variable thickness. For example, the face insert 16 may havea thicker center section and thinner outer section. In anotherembodiment, the face insert 16 may have two or more differentthicknesses and the transition between thicknesses may be radiused orstepped. Alternatively, the face insert 16 may increase or decrease inthickness towards the toe, heel, sole or crown portions 18, 20, 22 and26 of the club head 10. It will be appreciated that one or both of theexterior or interior surfaces 34 and 36 may have at least a portion thatis curved, stepped or flat to vary the thickness of the face insert 16.As will also be appreciated, the face insert 16 may have any suitableconstruction.

As shown in FIGS. 1-2, a slot 40 is formed in the perimeter region 30.As illustrated, the slot 40 is elongated and is formed in the soleportion 22 of the body 14 of the club head 10. The slot 40 provides aspace or opening in the club head 10, such that the face insert 16flexes when the face insert 16 impacts a golf ball. This slot 40 allowsthe face insert 16 to flex differently than would otherwise be possible,and this flexure provides the benefit of longer distance and reductionin error for miss-hit shots. The slot 40 provides more forgiveness, suchthat a zone 42 for a sweet spot on the face insert 16 is increased,resulting in the ball being hit a consistent distance from a larger areaon the face insert 16.

The slot 40 may provide a localized benefit of longer distance andreduction in error between the slot 40 and a geometric face center GFCof the face insert 16. For example, by providing a slot 40 in theperimeter region 30 adjacent the sole portion 22 of the club head, areduction in error for thin shots, shots hit low on the club face, maybe found. Thus, shots hit lower on the club face of the inventive clubhead will go farther than when compared with the same shot off a clubface of a conventional club head. Similar results may be found for aclub head 10 with slots 40 provided on other portions of the perimeterregion 30 and shots hit away from the geometric face center GFC, betweenthe face center and the slot 40.

In a preferred embodiment, the slot 40 is provided such that it issubstantially parallel to a portion of an edge 44 of the body 14 and isprovided within a certain distance D from a face plane 46 defined by theface insert 16. Preferably, the slot 40 is provided a distance D within30 mm of the face plane 46 of the face insert 16, more preferably within20 mm of the face plane 46, and most preferably within 10 mm of the faceplane 46. The slot 40 has first and second opposing ends 48 and 50.Preferably, the slot is elongated. The slot 40 has a width W and alength L. Preferably, the slot 40 has a width W greater than 1 mm and alength L of greater than 15 mm. Although, it will be appreciated thatthe slot may have any suitable width or length.

The 40 slot may be formed in the perimeter region 30 by any suitablemanner. Preferably, the slot is machined into the perimeter region 30 ofthe body 14 of the club head 10. Alternatively, the slot 40 may be cast,forged or stamped into the perimeter region 30 of the body 14 while theclub head 10 is being formed.

The slot 40 may remain empty. However, as illustrated in FIGS. 3-4C, inorder to comply with the United States Golf Association (USGA) rules,the slot 40 may be at least partially filled with one or morenonstructural or cosmetic materials 52. Preferably, the material is anelastomeric material, such as silicone. As illustrated in FIG. 3, theslot 40 is simply an opening in the body 14 of the club head 10. Anelastomeric material may be provided within the opening. The elastomericmaterial may be held within the slot by an interference fit, adhesive,or any other suitable means or combination thereof. The material mayextend to any desired degree into the cavity 32 of the club head 10. Aswill be appreciated, if the cavity 32 of the club head is filled with afoam or other low specific gravity material, this may also fill the slot40, such that it is not an exposed opening on the club head 10.

Referring now to FIGS. 4A-4C, the slot 40 may have numerous differentconstructions other than being a simple opening in the club head asshown in FIG. 3. Although, these embodiments illustrate the slot 40formed adjacent the sole, it will be appreciated that slots of any ofthese constructions may be provided at any location on the perimeterregion 30. In one embodiment, as illustrated in FIG. 4A, the slot 40 maybe filled with an elastomeric insert 54. In order to keep theelastomeric insert 54 within the slot 40, the slot 40 may be providedwith grooves 56 in the edges of the slot 40 along at least a portion ofits length. The elastomeric insert 54 may have protrusions 58 that fitwithin the grooves 56, such that the insert is kept within the slotthrough normal use of the club head.

Alternatively, as shown in FIG. 4B, the slot 40 may be formed in theperimeter region 30 by having a portion 60 of the perimeter region 30spaced from a portion 62 of the body 14 of the club head 10. Asillustrated, the portion 60 of the perimeter region is bent into thecavity 32 of the club head 10 such that a pathway 64 between the body 14and the perimeter region 30 is formed. The pathway 64 may be wholly orpartially filled with one or more elastomeric materials.

In another embodiment illustrated in FIG. 4C, the portion 62 of the body14 of the club head 10 may instead be bent inward into the cavity 32 ofthe club head forming a pathway 64 with the portion 60 of the perimeterregion 30 to make the slot 40. As illustrated, the pathway 64 may bepartially or wholly filled with one or more elastomeric materials.

In another embodiment illustrated in FIG. 5, in order to reduce stresson the slot 40, the opposing ends 48 and 50 of the slot 40 may haveexpanded slot portions 66 and 68. The expanded slot portions at the endsof the slot reduce stress on the slot that may occur during normal play.This may reduce the chance of a fracture occurring at one or both endsof the slot.

It will be appreciated that the slot may have different shapes otherthan a simple straight slot, an elongated slot or a slot with expandedslot portions. The slot may have a C-shape. For example as illustratedin FIG. 6, the slot 40 may have the opposing ends 48 and 50 angled froma center portion 70 of the slot 40. The opposing ends 48 and 50 may beangled at any desired angle θ relative to the center portion or have anydesired curvature or radius.

In an alternative embodiment illustrated in FIG. 7, the slot 40 may beprovided in the perimeter region 30 on the crown portion 26 of the body14 of the club head 10. Additionally, as illustrated in FIG. 8, slots 40may be provided in one or both of the toe or heel portions 18, 20 of thebody of the club head. By placing one or more slots 40 in differentareas of the perimeter region 30, the flex of the face insert 16 may bemodified compared with a conventional club face. The change in flex mayresult in more distance and greater accuracy for miss-hit shots. Forexample, by providing the slot 40 in the perimeter region 30 adjacentthe crown portion 26 of the club head, a reduction in error for shotshit high on the club face may be found. Thus, shots hit higher on theclub face of the inventive club will go farther than when compared withthe same shot off a club face with a conventional club head. A slotprovided adjacent the toe or heel portion 18, 20 will achieve similarresults for shots hit between the geometric face center GFC and eitherthe toe or heel.

It will be appreciated that one or more of the slots illustrated inFIGS. 1-8 may be combined with one another. It will be appreciated thatproviding slots in each of the toe, heel, sole and crown portions 18,20, 22 and 26 of the perimeter region 30 may provide global improvementto the overall distance; however, localized benefits between thegeometric face center GFC and each slot may be decreased. Additionally,it will be appreciated that the slot 40 may not be a single slot, butmay be comprised of multiple openings (not shown) that form the slot 40.

As illustrated, the slot 40 is provided in a fairway wood; however, itwill be appreciated that the slot 40 may be provided in a driver oriron. In particular, it may be beneficial to provide a slot 40 on adriver in the crown portion and/or both the crown portion and soleportion. For irons, a slot 40 in the sole portion might provide the samebenefits as for a fairway wood, increased distance and forgiveness forthin shots. Preferably, an iron with a slot according to the inventionwould have a thin face.

As will be appreciated, the face insert 16 has a geometric face centerGFC and an area of maximum coefficient of restitution or maximumresilience. Preferably, the area of maximum resilience is disposedbetween the geometric face center GFC and the slot 40. In anotherembodiment, the area of maximum coefficient of restitution is disposedwithin the zone 42 on the face insert 16 and the maximum coefficient ofrestitution is closer to the geometric face center GFC as compared witha club head without a slot. Preferably, the coefficient of restitutionover the entire face insert 16 is at least 70% and more preferably atleast 80% of the maximum coefficient of restitution within the zone 42.

In another embodiment, the area of maximum coefficient of restitutionMCR is provided a distance X from the geometric face center GFC.Preferably, the distance X is less than about 20 mm, more preferablyless than about 10 mm. In another embodiment, the maximum coefficient ofrestitution is within 2 mm of the geometric face center GFC. It isexpected that as the COR increases the ball flight distance willincrease and the maximum total distance will increase. The COR of thearea between the geometric face center GFC and the slot 40 may beincreased. For the inventive club head, preferably the COR is greaterthan about 0.8, and more preferably greater than 0.81. Preferably, theCOR for the zone 42 is at least about 0.81, and more preferably, atleast about 0.82.

Now referring to FIG. 9, the graph plots carry distance versus verticalimpact position and head construction comparing a conventional club withan inventive club having a slot 40 as illustrated in FIG. 1. Asillustrated, an impact at the geometric face center GFC of the club faceis 0 on the graph, with negative numbers showing an impact toward thesole and positive numbers showing an impact toward the crown. Theinventive club may result in an increase, for the average PGA Tourplayer, in his fairway wood distance of 7 yards (245 yard to 252 yards)for a center shot, and a 60% reduction in the error caused by a shot hit⅛″ too low on the face. Thus, the club with the slot 40 would hit a ⅛″thin shot 250.6 yards, versus 252.6 yards for a center shot for adifference of 2 yards, while a conventional club would hit a ⅛″ thinshot 240.5 yards versus 245.3 yards for a center shot for a differenceof 4.8 yards. Thus, a club head according to the invention as shown inFIG. 1 is more forgiving of shots hit low on the club face.

FIG. 10 illustrates a graph showing ballspeed versus height off theground at impact for a conventional club without a slot, a clubaccording to the invention as shown in FIG. 5 with a slot 40 havingexpanded slot portions 66 and 68 in the perimeter region 30 of the soleportion 22, and a club according to the invention as shown in FIG. 1with an elongated slot in the perimeter region of the sole portion 22.Generally, with shots hit lower on the club face the slots 40 provide anincrease in ballspeed. For example, at about 12 mm from the ground theclub with the slot having expanded slot portions provides about anadditional 1.5 mph of ballspeed compared with a conventional club, whilethe club with the elongated slot provides about an additional 4 mph ofball speed compared to a conventional club. The higher off the groundthe impact, the less the increase in ballspeed when compared to aconventional club. Preferably, the speed at which a golf ball reboundsfrom the face insert of the inventive club head is increased at least0.5 mph as compared with a club head without a slot. The speed at whicha golf ball rebounds from the face insert of the inventive club head maybe increased by at least 0.3 mph, preferably at least 0.5 mph and morepreferably at least 1 mph as compared with a conventional club.

Referring to FIGS. 11-12, graphs plotting launch angle versus impactlocation for a fairway wood having a slot 40 according to the inventionand for a conventional club without a slot are illustrated. Theconventional club is a Titleist 980F Fairway wood with a 13° loft, andthe inventive club is the same club having a slot 40 provided in theperimeter region 30 of the sole portion 22 as illustrated in FIG. 1. Acomparison of the graphs illustrates that the club according to theinvention has an increase in launch angle for similar impact positions.Preferably, the launch angle at which a golf ball leaves the face insert16 of the inventive club is increased by at least 0.5 degrees ascompared with a conventional club without a slot in the club head. Thelaunch angle at which a golf ball leaves the face insert 16 of theinventive club may be increased by at least 0.3 degrees, preferably atleast 0.5 degrees and more preferably at least 1 degree as compared witha conventional club.

FIGS. 13-14, illustrate graphs plotting back spin versus impact locationfor a fairway wood having a slot 40 according to the invention and for aconventional club without a slot. The conventional club is a Titleist980F Fairway wood with a 13° loft, and the club according to theinvention is the same club having a slot 40 provided in the perimeterregion 30 of the sole portion 22 as illustrated in FIG. 1. A comparisonof the graphs illustrates that the inventive club has a decrease in backspin for similar impact locations. Preferably, the back spin of a golfball leaving the face insert 16 of the inventive club is decreased by atleast 100 rpm as compared with a conventional club without a slot in theclub head. Thus, a golf club according to the invention is moreforgiving of off-center hits than a conventional club without a slot.The back spin of a golf ball leaving the face insert of the inventiveclub may be decreased by at least 50 rpm, preferably 100 rpm, and morepreferably 150 rpm as compared with a conventional club.

As illustrated in FIG. 15, a graph of estimated carry distance versusdistance heelward of impact for a conventional club having no slot and aclub according to the invention having a slot in the heel and toe asillustrated in FIG. 8 is shown. As illustrated the farther from thegeometric face center GFC of the club face the ball is hit (thegeometric face center GFC between the heel and toe being 0 in the graph)the more distance a club according to the invention provides. Forexample, at −16 mm from geometric face center GFC the inventive clubprovides over an additional yard of distance, while at +16 mm theinventive club provides almost an additional yard. Thus, a club with aslot 40 according to the invention as illustrated in FIG. 8 is moreforgiving of hits not directly on the geometric face center GFC of theclub head 10 between the heel and toe than a conventional club.

Tests results of the inventive and conventional golf clubs illustratedin FIGS. 9-15 were performed using finite element analysis (FEA)software, and these results were confirmed by robot testing.

While various descriptions of the present invention are described above,it should be understood that the various features of each embodimentcould be used alone or in any combination thereof. Therefore, thisinvention is not to be limited to only the specifically preferredembodiments depicted herein. Further, it should be understood thatvariations and modifications within the spirit and scope of theinvention might occur to those skilled in the art to which the inventionpertains. For example, the face insert may have thickness variations ina step-wise or continuous fashion. In addition, the shapes and locationsof the slots are not limited to those disclosed herein. Accordingly, allexpedient modifications readily attainable by one versed in the art fromthe disclosure set forth herein that are within the scope and spirit ofthe present invention are to be included as further embodiments of thepresent invention. The scope of the present invention is accordinglydefined as set forth in the appended claims.

1. A golf club head, the club head comprising: a body having a perimeterregion defining an opening; a face insert disposed in the opening, theface insert having a geometric face center and an area of maximumcoefficient of restitution; and at least one slot disposed in theperimeter region of the body, wherein the speed at which a golf ballrebounds from the face insert of the club head is increased at least 0.5mph as compared with a club head without a slot.
 2. The golf club headof claim 1, wherein the speed at which a golf ball rebounds from theface insert of the club head is increased at least 1 mph as comparedwith a club head without a slot.
 3. The golf club head of claim 1,wherein the slot is an elongated slot substantially parallel to aportion of an edge of the body.
 4. The golf club head of claim 1,wherein the slot has a width of greater than 1 mm.
 5. The golf club headof claim 1, wherein the slot has a length of greater than 15 mm.
 6. Thegolf club head of claim 1, wherein the slot comprises two opposing ends,the ends having expanded slot portions.
 7. The golf club head of claim1, wherein the slot provides a space in the body, such that the faceinsert flexes when the face insert impacts a golf ball.
 8. The golf clubhead of claim 1, wherein the face insert defines a plane and the slot isdisposed less than 30 mm from the face plane.
 9. The golf club head ofclaim 1, wherein the body is substantially filled with at least oneelastomeric material.
 10. The golf club head of claim 1, wherein thearea of maximum resilience is disposed between the face center and theslot.
 11. The golf club head of claim 1, wherein the area of maximumcoefficient of restitution is provided less than about 20 mm from thegeometric face center.
 12. The golf club head of claim 11, wherein thearea of maximum coefficient of restitution is provided less than about10 mm from the geometric face center.
 13. The golf club head of claim 1,wherein the area of maximum coefficient of restitution is within 2 mm ofthe geometric face center.
 14. The golf club head of claim 1, whereinthe face insert defines a plane and at least one of the slots isdisposed on a sole portion of the perimeter region adjacent the faceplane.
 15. The golf club head of claim 1, wherein face insert defines aplane and at least one of the slots is disposed on a crown portion ofthe perimeter region adjacent the face plane.
 16. The golf club head ofclaim 1, wherein the face insert defines a plane and at least one of theslots is disposed on a heel portion of the perimeter region adjacent theface plane.
 17. The golf club head of claim 1, wherein the face insertdefines a plane and at least one of the slots is disposed on a toeportion of the perimeter region adjacent the face plane.
 18. The golfclub head of claim 1, wherein the slot increases the carry distance of aball hit with the club head as compared with a club head without a slot.19. The golf club head of claim 1, wherein the slot increases the launchangle of a golf ball leaving the face insert after impact with the clubhead as compared with a club head without a slot.
 20. The golf club headof claim 1, wherein the slot decreases the back spin of a golf ballleaving the face insert after impact with the club head as compared witha club head without a slot.